Law, Technology and Humans is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing original, innovative research concerned with the human and humanity of law and technology.
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
Articles. Articles should be between 5,000-10,000 words (this includes footnotes and bibliography) and include an abstract (250 words). Full papers are required at the time of submission and if accepted by the editorial team will undergo a double-blind peer review.
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
Book Reviews. Reviews should be between 600-1000 words.
Please download the Law, Technology and Humans Author Guidelines for format requirements and referencing style information and examples
Authors retain copyright and grant the Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). This Licence allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Some third party content, including images, may have been used with permission. Therefore, you may need to replace those images or obtain permission to use.
Notify us of a copyright problem via the information provided on the QUT Copyright page.
Peer Review Process
All submitted papers should be original, unpublished, and not in consideration for publication elsewhere at the time of submission to Law, Technology and Humans.
All articles will be refereed in a double-blind review process by at least two reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area.
Biannual: May and November. There may be early release of articles published at any time as Online First
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Authors can submit and publish at no cost. There are no APCs (Article Processing Charges)
Law, Technology and Humans adheres to the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access:
… free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.
An information page summarising Open Access can be found here
Archiving and Self-Archiving
Authors are permitted (and encouraged) to post their work online in institutional/disciplinary repositories or on their own websites. Pre-print versions posted online should include a citation and link to the final published version in Law, Technology and Humans as soon as the issue is available; post-print versions (including the final publisher's PDF) should include a citation and link to the journal's website.
This journal currently utilises the LOCKSS program which offers decentralized and distributed preservation, seamless perpetual access, and preservation of the authentic original version of the content. The PKP Preservation Network (PN) ensures that journals that are not part of any other digital preservation service (such as CLOCKSS or Portico) can be preserved for long-term access. The Journal title is included in a digital archive https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2652-4074# The Journal's SHERPA/RoMEO record can be found at https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/36811
Ethics and Integrity
This Journal has a Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Law, Technology and Humans has aligned with the ethos and best practice guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) for dealing with ethical issues in journal publishing and has adopted the COPE guidelines which the journal members (Editorial Board, editors and the journal manager) have agreed meet the purposes and objectives of the Journal.
Recognising our ethical and other responsibilities, we take all possible measures against malpractice and we are committed to ensuring that reprint, advertising or other commercial revenue or political gain has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. We publish papers based only on their quality, importance, originality, and relevance to our remit. We evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, citizenship, ethnic origin, or political philosophy of the authors.
We also acknowledge different guidelines to inform research practice, underpinned by the principles expressed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. For example, the Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research and Te Ara Tika — guidelines for Māori research ethics.
We are committed to ensuring ethics in publication and high quality of scholarship. Conformance to standards of ethical behaviour is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) warrant that the manuscript is their own, original work and that it has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Submitting the same manuscript concurrently to more than one journal is unacceptable. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical conduct and is unacceptable. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: The editors of this journal will evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit and fit with the journal's themes. The editors are responsible for deciding which submitted papers should be published. The editor and any editorial staff must maintain confidentiality and not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher. The editors will not use unpublished information in their own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: This journal uses a blind peer review process which assists in making editorial decisions. The review process usually takes 4-6 weeks. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by reviewer without the express written consent of the author. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Peer reviewers’ identities are protected as are authors.
Occasionally authors may request corrections to a published article. The decision to correct an article is the responsibility of the editorial team. All requests for corrections are considered on an individual basis and in consultation with the Editorial Board. Where a correction is made Law, Technology and Humans will update and publish the article with a new DOI, and a correction notice will be published separately. Updated metadata will be redelivered to our various indexing services.
Suspected plagiarism in a submission:
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical conduct and is unacceptable. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Law, Technology and Humans uses iThenticate - plagiarism detection software - and may utilise the software if the editorial team or the reviewer/s have concerns about original content.